| Login

Marc's Voice

building the open web one bit at a time

Store your own comments (as a solution to “comment aggregation”)

Stephen Downes just posted a really good idea on my post about ‘comment aggregation’.

Marc - I have long thought that the way comments (and email, for that matter) should be processed is that when a comment is made - no matter where it’s made - it is posted and stored on the commenter’s (or emailer’s) OWN server.

This would be enabled by something like OpenID, which would tell a remote site where the comment should be posed (I log on as downes.openid.ca which tells the blog website to sent my comment to a form at downes.openid.ca/comments.cgi)

The recipient (or a comment or an email) would recieve only a short notification - a ping - which they can accept or reject according to local rules (eg., is there a social net connection, is it from a trusted whitelist, whatever).

I think that so long as we leave content on other people’s sites (or in their in-boxes) we will have the dual problems of spam and host lock-in.

The primary use of OpenID should not simply be identification, but also, to tell remote sites where to direct our actions. So - in a sense - I carry all my own home website tools with me when I travel around the web.

You can see all comments on this post here:
http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2009/02/comment-aggregation#comments

I really like this idea.  It stays true to the notion of the distributed web.  Now we need some kick ass open source software that implements this. And please don’t make it GPL.

Date: Thursday, February 12th, 2009 | Time: 4:38 pm
Tags:
Add a comment

No Replies

  1. So an open source, self-hosted version of Disqus/Intense Debate?

  2. So an open source, self-hosted version of Disqus/Intense Debate?

  3. This sounds a *lot* like OpenMicroBlogging (only with longer messages).

    Perhaps the OMB spec and the AGPL code in Laconica could be used to implement this (maybe as a Wordpress plugin)?

    I know Evan’s working on integrating cross-server at-replies in version 0.2 of the spec, and this seems like a logical extension of that.

    So ideally, there’d be a generic “Comment on this” link here. Clicking it would take one to their Identi.ca / Twitter / whatever account.

    The “Sup?” box would be prefilled with some magic string (like an at-reply) which would reference this post, syntax something like re:http://example.com/post-urkl. (This is similar to a mailto:foo@example.org?subject=bar link for email.) I’d enter my comment and you’d be pinged as you describe.

  4. This sounds a *lot* like OpenMicroBlogging (only with longer messages).

    Perhaps the OMB spec and the AGPL code in Laconica could be used to implement this (maybe as a Wordpress plugin)?

    I know Evan’s working on integrating cross-server at-replies in version 0.2 of the spec, and this seems like a logical extension of that.

    So ideally, there’d be a generic “Comment on this” link here. Clicking it would take one to their Identi.ca / Twitter / whatever account.

    The “Sup?” box would be prefilled with some magic string (like an at-reply) which would reference this post, syntax something like re:http://example.com/post-urkl. (This is similar to a mailto:foo@example.org?subject=bar link for email.) I’d enter my comment and you’d be pinged as you describe.

  5. This is exactly what I’m waiting for. Disqus & Co is not for me.

  6. This is exactly what I’m waiting for. Disqus & Co is not for me.