I do not compromise

Michael Arrington just accused me of compromising. He said I must be trying to sell my company or suck up to one of the big platforms for a consulting agreement.

I beg to differ.

I pointed Michael to my post on:

“The Religion of Bringing Social to Software”

In this post I analyze a new trend I’m seeing; three announcements that happened within a week of each other: MySpace’s Data Availability, Facebook’s Connect and Google’s Friend Connect - ALL THREE had fundamentally the same strategy!

They’re all keeping their member’s data on their servers, while sending out tentacles to mesh in with as many outside sites as they can. These tentacles may be widgets, apps or iFrames - but its all the same strategy.

I state in that post:

I was going to originally call this post Data Availability = Facebook Connect (both are still lock-in) - but Google made it a three-way game today. Including Microsoft seems apropos because it typifies how important this battle is - and how important it is for us - to continue to demand our rights.

Though I agree with Dare Obasanjo that interoperability is just as important as data portability, these three initiatives prove that Data Portability is a subject we need to keep screaming about.

These three announcements prove that MySpace, Google and Facebook assume that once a user enters into their domain, that they own that user, that they control what happens with that user’s data and that they fully intend on squeezing every last dime out of monetizing that user - until the cow’s come home.

This is essentially the mantra Jonathan Abrams spoke to me about - when I first met him in 2003 - and it’s the mantra of every single large social networking platform since then.

This is why we created the Bill of Rights for Users of Social Media. We had to make it clear what we wanted - and so far - no one has really given that to us.

So I don’t see that as compromise. But I forgive Michael - I know he’s busy and his mailbox is full - I can’t even call him. And I feel confidant I will be vindicated.

Meanwhile Michael asked me to post some images of the mural’s work in progress. Its going to evolve all summer. But here are some works in progress shots - with annotation:

id-wip.jpg

I’ll start at the beginning - which is the ID - me - my social graph and lists of Groups I’m a member of and my various personas. This is what the battles are all about - locking this data in. But it’s just the beginning of the war. Essentially ID has to do with everything.

mktplace.jpg

Then there’s the People’s Marketplace forming around US monetizing our data, not just them. Putting ourselves into Context. Managing them instead of them managing us. VRM

But to pretend like capitalism won’t continue to try and manipulate us and rip us off - would also be foolish. So just cause I’m trying to be pragmatic, does not mean I’m compromising. I’m looking for common ground. As Rodney King said “can’t we all just live together?

mystore.jpg

The next big area on this fence is about My Storage and Structured Content. I need to store my stuff in the cloud, and anywhere else I want to. And we need to keep track of my reviews, my events, my media - all properly indexed with tags and meta-data. I don’t have to tell this to Michael - he invested in Omnidrive.

ubiqwip.jpg

Then there’s the issue of persistent ubiquitous content. The stuff that’s free as well as all the commercial stuff. Having that there - all the time - really changes the game IMHO. It’s UGC, it’s wikipedia, it’s iTunes, it’s the BBC. The Internet Archive. DMOZ.

These are all big issues - where UGC and commercial interests coincide.

ui-objects.jpg

And I have this notion of reusable User Interface objects. Here are five.

- A Dashboard to hold everything - and be our start page

- A Gallery for our media, playlists, albums and sharing

- A tool to Express ourselves. Otehrwise known as blogging tools, media upload, podcasting, vlogging, etc.

- A way to Watch what’s going on in our lives and community.

- And a way to ‘chuck’ out our ideas, thoughts, status, IMs, twits, videos - in a real-time manner. It’s what I call Talk.

toolwip.jpg

And new kinds of tools. That’s what I am. A toolsmith. I did it before and we’re doing it again. As Director was to multimedia, so will this mesh stuff be to the open web. But we won’t be the only company doing it. It’s NOT about single vendor lock-in nowadays.

livewip.jpg

And the Live Web - we can’t live without my Twitter, IM, FriendFeed, VoIP, Second Life, mobile phone and real-time reality! So it’s all coming together in an inter-connected mesh of our digital lifestyles.

widewip.jpg

And in case you’re wondering what all those blurry spray canned red, orange and purple lines are that are connecting everything together - why that’s RSS, feeds, APIs, real-time presence, states, attention information and good old fashioned interoperability and data portability. That’s me routing content all over the place and configuring MY Open Mesh the way I want it to be.

Routing this data, the infrastructure to make it all happen and the way we work together is as much the mesh - as anything else. And THAT’s why we have to recognize and work with these behemoths and their lock-in strategy.

Suffer the fool who’s idealism sinks everything.

You’ll also notice this underlying ID layer along the bottom and the importance of State, Redundancy and Context. These are models essential to the open mesh. My mural maps out constructs, infrastructure and standards as well..

So I want to officially disagree with Michael Arrington and what he said on the show today - I think I can be idealistic and pragmatic at the same time. Its called “life”.

17 Responses to “I do not compromise”

  1. Battle Over Data Ownership on Gillmor Gang Says:

    […] debate simply because Facebook is suddenly telling him everything he wants to hear, says that his position hasn’t changed (nevertheless, it has). Robert Scoble simply apologized for being on the wrong side of the issue, […]

  2. Unfortune Says:

    […] debate simply because Facebook is suddenly telling him everything he wants to hear, says that his position hasn’t changed (nevertheless, it has). Robert Scoble simply apologized for being on the wrong side of the issue, […]

  3. Rick Calvert Says:

    Marc has anyone ever told you that you are scary smart?

  4. Mike Arrington is wrong, but not about Facebook « Paying Attention Says:

    […] Marc Canter: At least they are doing something - and Facebook seems to give the user most privacy control. […]

  5. TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ » 本日のGillmor Gang:「データ主導権争いを語る」 Says:

    […] Facebookが突然耳に心地よいことばかり言い始めたからといって、それだけでデータ・ポータビリティ論争の思想的リーダーのポジションを放棄するとは何事か、と私に非難されたMarc Canterは、「ポジションは変わってない」と書いてきた(でも、変わったんだ)。 […]

  6. What is data? at Liako.Biz Says:

    […] leading voices in technology have exploded in discussion about data portability, data rights, and the future of web applications. As […]

  7. Steven Hatch’s Blog » Blog Archive » links for 2008-05-18 Says:

    […] Marc’s Voice : Blog Archive : I do not compromise “three announcements that happened within a week of each other: MySpace’s Data Availability, Facebook’s Connect and Google’s Friend Connect - ALL THREE had fundamentally the same strategy!” (tags: socialnetworking socialsoftware platform media social data dataportability facebook google myspace) […]

  8. Data portability « Toni’s Garage Says:

    […] Marc Canter is painting a fence in his backyard with an open data mural. I love that. What a great reflection of his personality and passion and of Silicon Valley as a […]

  9. Battle Over Data Ownership on Gillmor Gang - biginfo.org Says:

    […] debate simply because Facebook is suddenly telling him everything he wants to hear, says that his position hasn’t changed (nevertheless, it has). Robert Scoble simply apologized for being on the wrong side of the issue, […]

  10. echovar » Blog Archive » The Network’s Continental Congress: Searls, Gillmor, Windley, Arrington Says:

    […] Robert Scoble and Mike Arrington engaged in heated debate over ownership of identity artifacts. The wall at the back of Marc Canter’s revolutionary garden emerged as an offline visual rough draft of our constitutional articles. Canter also put forward […]

  11. Wie Google’s Friend Connect funktioniert « c/o operative Says:

    […] diese Daten bei einem Wechsel problemlos mitnehmen zu können (=Data Portability). Experten wie Marc Canter, Chris Saad oder Dare Obasanjo beweifeln allerdings, dass die großen Player eswirklich ernst damit […]

  12. Jon Says:

    Marc,

    I cannot believe I just found your site. Count another RSS subscriber.

  13. chris Says:

    Thanks for the comprehensive overview - people may disagree about the details but it a framework helps us get beyond the press release echo chamber.

  14. Nathan Ketsdever Says:

    Fences are the new whiteboards apparently……

  15. Bin ich schon drin? « Joerns Weblog Says:

    […] Das soll sich ändern: die Daten aus den sozialen Netzwerken sollen künftig auf beliebigen Seiten verfügbar sein. Dann könnte beispielsweise ich als Blogbetreiber (bei WordPress.com) auf seiner Seite ein Fenster unterbringen, in dem meine Freundesliste aus einem sozialen Netzwerk (z.B. Facebook) erscheint. Die derzeitigen Ansätze sehen also bildlich gesprochen eher ein ‘Ausleihen von Daten’ vor (schön beschrieben auf der Seite Marc). […]

  16. R. Titus Says:

    Hi Marc, just an FYI I’ve completely ripped off the data-model/map on this for a presentation I’m giving to the BBC. I’m trying to get everyone’s head around where identity, persona and data are taking us in 2012, particularly as they involve User Experience. I’ll share it with you after if you like.

    Dinner on me when you come to UK.

    best

  17. Marc’s Voice » Blog Archive » June 2nd blogging '08 Says:

    […] Chris and I may WANT open standards, but those take time to evolve. In the meantime (even though Michael Arrington thinks it’s compromising) I believe we HAVE to work with all these proprietary standards - to at least deliver compelling […]