<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whatever happened to tagging?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Can&#8217;t I Search My Enterprise Data As Well As Google Searches the Internet? (Enterprise Page Rank?) &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging#comment-242351</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Can&#8217;t I Search My Enterprise Data As Well As Google Searches the Internet? (Enterprise Page Rank?) &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging#comment-242351</guid>
		<description>[...] World Wide Web for this are links and tagging.  Marc Canter and others have recently bemoaned that tagging hasn&#8217;t really kept up, so perhaps links are a more preferable mechanism.  Tagging without links is possible, but one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] World Wide Web for this are links and tagging.  Marc Canter and others have recently bemoaned that tagging hasn&#8217;t really kept up, so perhaps links are a more preferable mechanism.  Tagging without links is possible, but one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Personality Types &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging#comment-242324</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Personality Types &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging#comment-242324</guid>
		<description>[...] wants to get involved.  Perhaps the involvement is fairly passive: they&#8217;d like to tag the information or attach private comments to it for their own use.  Perhaps they keep a book mark on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wants to get involved.  Perhaps the involvement is fairly passive: they&#8217;d like to tag the information or attach private comments to it for their own use.  Perhaps they keep a book mark on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mower</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging#comment-242320</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Mower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging#comment-242320</guid>
		<description>Hi Marc. I realise it's your word to choose but I'd like to think I was less moaning about the state of tagging and more puzzled, yet happy because there is still so much undiscovered country to explore.

David: I was not arguing that tagging hasn't become vastly more prevalent than it was in 2003/4. It has and Technorati has clearly been a big part of that. No my argument is that tagging doesn't seem to have become vastly more useful than it was in 2003/4.

But if the tools have not kept up with the data that's nobody's fault, just a great big opportunity :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marc. I realise it&#8217;s your word to choose but I&#8217;d like to think I was less moaning about the state of tagging and more puzzled, yet happy because there is still so much undiscovered country to explore.</p>
<p>David: I was not arguing that tagging hasn&#8217;t become vastly more prevalent than it was in 2003/4. It has and Technorati has clearly been a big part of that. No my argument is that tagging doesn&#8217;t seem to have become vastly more useful than it was in 2003/4.</p>
<p>But if the tools have not kept up with the data that&#8217;s nobody&#8217;s fault, just a great big opportunity <img src='http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sifry</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging#comment-242319</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sifry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging#comment-242319</guid>
		<description>Whaaa?

Marc, Tagging has ALWAYS been totally open.  all it takes is rel="tag".  That's it.  Technorati created a namespace that people could use if they wanted to, but a thousand flowers have bloomed.  Look at wordpress.com - they created their own namespace at wordpress.com/tags , Look at Techcrunch, they did it too.  Heck, look at The New York Times: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/patent-litigation/

So, um, you can leave off on the personal attacks.  Thanks, it's noted, but irrelevant.  

Over 250 million tagged posts have been created, and that was at last check, about 6 months ago. I'd say it's been pretty darned successful.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whaaa?</p>
<p>Marc, Tagging has ALWAYS been totally open.  all it takes is rel=&#8221;tag&#8221;.  That&#8217;s it.  Technorati created a namespace that people could use if they wanted to, but a thousand flowers have bloomed.  Look at wordpress.com - they created their own namespace at wordpress.com/tags , Look at Techcrunch, they did it too.  Heck, look at The New York Times: <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/patent-litigation/" rel="nofollow">http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/patent-litigation/</a></p>
<p>So, um, you can leave off on the personal attacks.  Thanks, it&#8217;s noted, but irrelevant.  </p>
<p>Over 250 million tagged posts have been created, and that was at last check, about 6 months ago. I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s been pretty darned successful.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Downes</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging#comment-242315</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/08/whatever-happened-to-tagging#comment-242315</guid>
		<description>Or, it could be, that when I criticized tagging a couple of years ago at Northern Voice, I was right. http://www.downes.ca/post/14</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, it could be, that when I criticized tagging a couple of years ago at Northern Voice, I was right. <a href="http://www.downes.ca/post/14" rel="nofollow">http://www.downes.ca/post/14</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
