<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Labeling of Social Network relationships</title>
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/06/open-labeling-of-social-network-relationships</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Kingsley Idehen</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/06/open-labeling-of-social-network-relationships#comment-241838</link>
		<author>Kingsley Idehen</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/06/open-labeling-of-social-network-relationships#comment-241838</guid>
		<description>Marc,

All well and true for Dave to have his "Open Networking" epiphany. What I don't get is how -in his mind- this is incongruent with the whole Semantic Data Web vision. From the get-go everything about the Semantic Web was about the underlying infrastructure of open Networking of People, Places, and Other Things. 

A Social Network is a network whose links (properties) are of the social variety. A Network and a Graph are the same thing. Thus, RDF is an expression or model of a Network.

I am not trying to lecture you here, I am justing expressing confusion I see in comments such as those from Dave. Did we have to have Social Networking silos in place first, to exert the pain of lock-in, before we could open ourselves up to the underlying thinking behind the Semantic Data Web vision? 

Anyway, the great news is that infrastructure is already in place  (thanks to resilience of the Semantic Web vision)  as we move towards  Web of openly accessible Data :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc,</p>
<p>All well and true for Dave to have his &#8220;Open Networking&#8221; epiphany. What I don&#8217;t get is how -in his mind- this is incongruent with the whole Semantic Data Web vision. From the get-go everything about the Semantic Web was about the underlying infrastructure of open Networking of People, Places, and Other Things. </p>
<p>A Social Network is a network whose links (properties) are of the social variety. A Network and a Graph are the same thing. Thus, RDF is an expression or model of a Network.</p>
<p>I am not trying to lecture you here, I am justing expressing confusion I see in comments such as those from Dave. Did we have to have Social Networking silos in place first, to exert the pain of lock-in, before we could open ourselves up to the underlying thinking behind the Semantic Data Web vision? </p>
<p>Anyway, the great news is that infrastructure is already in place  (thanks to resilience of the Semantic Web vision)  as we move towards  Web of openly accessible Data <img src='http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linker Barn: Hump Day June 20</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/06/open-labeling-of-social-network-relationships#comment-241689</link>
		<author>Linker Barn: Hump Day June 20</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 05:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/06/open-labeling-of-social-network-relationships#comment-241689</guid>
		<description>[...] Canter on open labeling of social network [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Canter on open labeling of social network [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
