Open Labeling of Social Network relationships

Dave Winer speaks of an ‘explosion of unbundling’ in a recent post called ‘Its time to open up networking, again’. He’s referring to how he thinks the distributed mesh of interconnected social networks will evolve - and Dave drills down into ‘the labels’ used to define social relationships - as one example of an open standard architecture that is needed.

It’s one of those epiphany moments which I think will have rippling ramifications for years to come.

Eventually, soon I think, we’ll see an explosive unbundling of the services that make up social networks. What was centralized in the form of Facebook, Linked-in, even YouTube, is going to blow up and reconstitute itself. How exactly it will happen is something the historians can argue about 25 years from now. It hasn’t happened yet, but it will, unless the rules of technology evolution have been repealed (and they haven’t, trust me).

Dave posits that a relationship label can be almost an arbitrary tag that can be assigned to what Dave calls the ‘arc’ of relationships between two people. These ‘relationship’ tags would be normalised and stored in a shared space, where anyone could anchor or ricochet off of them. I guess.

Creating a web service for sharing relationship labels should be easy enough but its the sourrounding activity and uptake that is required to really build an ‘open standard’. Dave should know. He’s seen his really simple syndication format blossom into an entire ecosystem.

Public servers fileld with shareable data, acting like a People’s DNS or even just ricocheting posts are other kinds of technology that can be brought to bear for ‘open standards’.

These sort of public servers would help form a distributed mesh which today is made up of ping servers, blog rolls and feed search engines.

So if you could imagine shared, open Twitter clouds, del.icio.us link lists, Digg opinions, Yelp reviews, Eventful events or MyBlogLog groups - that’s what I’m talking about.

Shared relationship labels or some sort of arbitrary way to just add your own label to a relationship and have it mean something, is another great technique for our distributed meshed web.

You can imagine other open public servers which could:

- keep track of your preferred blogging editor?

- store reviews or events - centered around a tag?

- keep a set of destinations of where you wish to send your blog posts to?

- let you keep track of where your friends are and what they’re doing?

- maintain multiple collections of all your media - throughout the web

- track which systems can understand the kind of data I want to import?

- something that can act as a reliable 3rd party and keep track of who I am and what claims I’m making about myself

- and ultimately store all this stuff in a master profile - which is not controlled by any one vendor.

These open servers are the foundation of what I’ve called ‘open source infrastructure’ that will help facilitate the meshing together of 1,000s of open networks - if not 100,000s.

We need to figure out how to do open Ecommerce, empower folks with their own behaviour patterns and click histories and aggregate various reputation systems together as well.

2 Responses to “Open Labeling of Social Network relationships”

  1. Linker Barn: Hump Day June 20 Says:

    […] Canter on open labeling of social network […]

  2. Kingsley Idehen Says:

    Marc,

    All well and true for Dave to have his “Open Networking” epiphany. What I don’t get is how -in his mind- this is incongruent with the whole Semantic Data Web vision. From the get-go everything about the Semantic Web was about the underlying infrastructure of open Networking of People, Places, and Other Things.

    A Social Network is a network whose links (properties) are of the social variety. A Network and a Graph are the same thing. Thus, RDF is an expression or model of a Network.

    I am not trying to lecture you here, I am justing expressing confusion I see in comments such as those from Dave. Did we have to have Social Networking silos in place first, to exert the pain of lock-in, before we could open ourselves up to the underlying thinking behind the Semantic Data Web vision?

    Anyway, the great news is that infrastructure is already in place (thanks to resilience of the Semantic Web vision) as we move towards Web of openly accessible Data :-)