<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Me.com copies us - too - acknowledges meta-networks is the way to go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/05/mecom-copies-us-too-acknowledges-meta-networks-is-the-way-to-go/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/05/mecom-copies-us-too-acknowledges-meta-networks-is-the-way-to-go</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Many kinds of meta-networks</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/05/mecom-copies-us-too-acknowledges-meta-networks-is-the-way-to-go#comment-240474</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Many kinds of meta-networks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 01:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/05/mecom-copies-us-too-acknowledges-meta-networks-is-the-way-to-go#comment-240474</guid>
		<description>[...] Charles Wooten of CollectiveX left a comment, informing me that his company has been doing meta-netw....  I had heard of CollectiveX but had no idea that they were also a network or networks - offered as a hosted solution.  I wonder if they also OEM/white label their system, like Me.com (but not Ning.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Charles Wooten of CollectiveX left a comment, informing me that his company has been doing meta-netw&#8230;.  I had heard of CollectiveX but had no idea that they were also a network or networks - offered as a hosted solution.  I wonder if they also OEM/white label their system, like Me.com (but not Ning.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarence Wooten</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/05/mecom-copies-us-too-acknowledges-meta-networks-is-the-way-to-go#comment-240473</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarence Wooten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 00:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/05/mecom-copies-us-too-acknowledges-meta-networks-is-the-way-to-go#comment-240473</guid>
		<description>It's interesting that you feel that Ning and Me.com both copied your business model.  CollectiveX has been executing on the "meta-network" model for a year now.  However, CollectiveX's market is less social and more professional and focused on getting things done.  None-the-less, the paltform network model that CollectiveX employs fits into the same meta-network category.  I think PeopleAggregator, Ning and now me.com all validate that we are all moving towards a market need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that you feel that Ning and Me.com both copied your business model.  CollectiveX has been executing on the &#8220;meta-network&#8221; model for a year now.  However, CollectiveX&#8217;s market is less social and more professional and focused on getting things done.  None-the-less, the paltform network model that CollectiveX employs fits into the same meta-network category.  I think PeopleAggregator, Ning and now me.com all validate that we are all moving towards a market need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
