<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenID skeptics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: IdM, OpenID, and Attribute Exchange &#171; MaisonBisson.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics#comment-239549</link>
		<dc:creator>IdM, OpenID, and Attribute Exchange &#171; MaisonBisson.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics#comment-239549</guid>
		<description>[...] short of it is that Marc Canter says that single sign-on is good, but “we need the attribute exchange to make this thing really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] short of it is that Marc Canter says that single sign-on is good, but “we need the attribute exchange to make this thing really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal Migurski</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics#comment-239504</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Migurski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics#comment-239504</guid>
		<description>"Anyone who is pooh-pooh the importance of a single, unified, unique key for all individual information across the internet just plain isn’t thinking."

I don't pooh-pooh its /importance/, I just think it's a door left wide open to terrifying abuses of privacy, both accidental and malicious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyone who is pooh-pooh the importance of a single, unified, unique key for all individual information across the internet just plain isn’t thinking.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t pooh-pooh its /importance/, I just think it&#8217;s a door left wide open to terrifying abuses of privacy, both accidental and malicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Identity Future &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenID = Authentication + Attribute Exchange +</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics#comment-239493</link>
		<dc:creator>Identity Future &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenID = Authentication + Attribute Exchange +</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics#comment-239493</guid>
		<description>[...] Marc Canter leapt to OpenID&#8217;s defense against Michal Migurski&#8217;s criticism. &#8230;there are those who think we DON’T need anything more than simple single sign-on. In fact I had lunch with the CEO of SixApart (Barak Berkowitz) who said Brad Fitzpatrick is fairly skeptical of anything beyond his original simple scenario. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marc Canter leapt to OpenID&#8217;s defense against Michal Migurski&#8217;s criticism. &#8230;there are those who think we DON’T need anything more than simple single sign-on. In fact I had lunch with the CEO of SixApart (Barak Berkowitz) who said Brad Fitzpatrick is fairly skeptical of anything beyond his original simple scenario. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kveton</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics#comment-239247</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kveton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics#comment-239247</guid>
		<description>As much as I'm a believer of OpenID Attribute Exchange, I don't think its a necessary requirement for OpenID to succeed.  Just doing simple single sign-on well will enable a huge (ginormous?) eco-system.  That is a success IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I&#8217;m a believer of OpenID Attribute Exchange, I don&#8217;t think its a necessary requirement for OpenID to succeed.  Just doing simple single sign-on well will enable a huge (ginormous?) eco-system.  That is a success IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Peterson</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics#comment-239244</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/openid-skeptics#comment-239244</guid>
		<description>look at the marketplace for single sign on technologies in the enterprise marketspace.  Look at how much easier life is for IT departments and users once it's implemented.

Anyone who is pooh-pooh the importance of a single, unified, unique key for all individual information across the internet just plain isn't thinking.

There is  NO EXCUSE for anyone using anything other than an openid for signon to any new web application.  The library is built, it works, and it makes a company's user information significantly more valuable by easy mergers and acquisitions.  Ask yahoo how much it cost in development work, database manipulation and customer good will to switch from flickr to yahoo ids?  millions certainly, probably tens of millions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look at the marketplace for single sign on technologies in the enterprise marketspace.  Look at how much easier life is for IT departments and users once it&#8217;s implemented.</p>
<p>Anyone who is pooh-pooh the importance of a single, unified, unique key for all individual information across the internet just plain isn&#8217;t thinking.</p>
<p>There is  NO EXCUSE for anyone using anything other than an openid for signon to any new web application.  The library is built, it works, and it makes a company&#8217;s user information significantly more valuable by easy mergers and acquisitions.  Ask yahoo how much it cost in development work, database manipulation and customer good will to switch from flickr to yahoo ids?  millions certainly, probably tens of millions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
