<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Land grabs, business models and open standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If you read this now, that makes me a blogger</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239409</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If you read this now, that makes me a blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239409</guid>
		<description>[...] Nik Cubrilovic figures out that there are too many providers of aOpenID ID&#8217;s.  No shit sherlock! This has been obvious since the get go. When a new ecosystem evolves that&#8217;s supposed to free end-users from lock-in - the only lock-in left is the non-locking-in. This is why I call non-lock-in, the new lock-in. But seriously lets FIRST get all these providers working with each other - so one can take an OpenID they got issued from broker A - and use it at Broker B&#8217;s site. If the ID issued by any broker doesn&#8217;t work - they need to get OUTED and CHASTISED so they STOP calling themselves OpenID compliant. Then we&#8217;ll let the market evolve organically. I predict that ALL major vendors will be issuing OpenID ID&#8217;s - but that (as I mention above) don&#8217;t mean doodley. That&#8217;s just a beginning. The bottom layer of the stack. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nik Cubrilovic figures out that there are too many providers of aOpenID ID&#8217;s.  No shit sherlock! This has been obvious since the get go. When a new ecosystem evolves that&#8217;s supposed to free end-users from lock-in - the only lock-in left is the non-locking-in. This is why I call non-lock-in, the new lock-in. But seriously lets FIRST get all these providers working with each other - so one can take an OpenID they got issued from broker A - and use it at Broker B&#8217;s site. If the ID issued by any broker doesn&#8217;t work - they need to get OUTED and CHASTISED so they STOP calling themselves OpenID compliant. Then we&#8217;ll let the market evolve organically. I predict that ALL major vendors will be issuing OpenID ID&#8217;s - but that (as I mention above) don&#8217;t mean doodley. That&#8217;s just a beginning. The bottom layer of the stack. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OLDaily[中文版] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007年3月14日</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239266</link>
		<dc:creator>OLDaily[中文版] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007年3月14日</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239266</guid>
		<description>[...] Canter, Marc&#8217;s Voice March 14, 2007 [原文链接] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canter, Marc&#8217;s Voice March 14, 2007 [原文链接] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why did Cisco buy Tribe AND Five Across</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239168</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why did Cisco buy Tribe AND Five Across</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239168</guid>
		<description>[...] They then offer this stack to developers who then take it and build out the future social web we&#8217;ve all been waiting for.  Remember from yesterday?  All software will be social!  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They then offer this stack to developers who then take it and build out the future social web we&#8217;ve all been waiting for.  Remember from yesterday?  All software will be social!  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuclear Sledgehammer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canter is on a roll</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239167</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuclear Sledgehammer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Canter is on a roll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239167</guid>
		<description>[...] Land grabs, business models and open standards  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Land grabs, business models and open standards  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media Club - &#187; Social Media Now: USA Today&#8217;s Leap Across the Chasm</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239150</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Club - &#187; Social Media Now: USA Today&#8217;s Leap Across the Chasm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239150</guid>
		<description>[...] easy to go back and forth between USA Today and the NY Times as much as between LinkedIn and tribe. Marc Canter is surely right about making social networking, identity, profiles, reputation and relationships [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] easy to go back and forth between USA Today and the NY Times as much as between LinkedIn and tribe. Marc Canter is surely right about making social networking, identity, profiles, reputation and relationships [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebDev</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239147</link>
		<dc:creator>WebDev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/land-grabs-business-models-and-open-standards#comment-239147</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social network&lt;/strong&gt;

Leggendo un articolo di oggi di Paolo Valdemarin riguardo i social network, scopro una &#34;piattaforma white label per la gestione di network sociali&#34; della Broadband Mechanics.Questa piattaforma, PeopleAggregator vuole essere &#34;il network d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social network</strong></p>
<p>Leggendo un articolo di oggi di Paolo Valdemarin riguardo i social network, scopro una &quot;piattaforma white label per la gestione di network sociali&quot; della Broadband Mechanics.Questa piattaforma, PeopleAggregator vuole essere &quot;il network d&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
