<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m in the NY Times today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/im-in-the-ny-times-today/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/im-in-the-ny-times-today</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mark pincus</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/im-in-the-ny-times-today#comment-239110</link>
		<dc:creator>mark pincus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 01:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/im-in-the-ny-times-today#comment-239110</guid>
		<description>marc, my recollection is that you tried to convince us to open source our code. never to get into the white lable business. obviously, i was a believer in the white label model which was behind my efforts to do the one.org deal early on; which as you know the new ceo rejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marc, my recollection is that you tried to convince us to open source our code. never to get into the white lable business. obviously, i was a believer in the white label model which was behind my efforts to do the one.org deal early on; which as you know the new ceo rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/im-in-the-ny-times-today#comment-239108</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 00:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/im-in-the-ny-times-today#comment-239108</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;less functionality - but has a great name&lt;/i&gt;

A lesson for everybody here?  

Kudos to you Marc for always advocating a very open development environment that focuses on the "social" rather than the "network".   Unfortunately I'm not sure People have a clear understanding of how People Aggregator has been working on an open do-it-yourself social network model for some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>less functionality - but has a great name</i></p>
<p>A lesson for everybody here?  </p>
<p>Kudos to you Marc for always advocating a very open development environment that focuses on the &#8220;social&#8221; rather than the &#8220;network&#8221;.   Unfortunately I&#8217;m not sure People have a clear understanding of how People Aggregator has been working on an open do-it-yourself social network model for some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.K. DeLong</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/im-in-the-ny-times-today#comment-239105</link>
		<dc:creator>B.K. DeLong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/im-in-the-ny-times-today#comment-239105</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Nick. I got very confused while trying to work with PeopleAgg and my primary social networks have become Facebook, LiveJournal and LinkedIn. Does OpenID incorporate FOAF, relationships and trust? I thought it was simply a unified, secure cross-site login service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Nick. I got very confused while trying to work with PeopleAgg and my primary social networks have become Facebook, LiveJournal and LinkedIn. Does OpenID incorporate FOAF, relationships and trust? I thought it was simply a unified, secure cross-site login service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/im-in-the-ny-times-today#comment-239102</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/im-in-the-ny-times-today#comment-239102</guid>
		<description>I think you could do a bit of work making PeopleAgg look better - get a really hot designer on it as it looks a bit clunky. People spend more time trying something if it looks great. That's where I think Ning has one over PeopleAgg. Still, Ning crashes both of my browsers IE7 and FF (sign).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you could do a bit of work making PeopleAgg look better - get a really hot designer on it as it looks a bit clunky. People spend more time trying something if it looks great. That&#8217;s where I think Ning has one over PeopleAgg. Still, Ning crashes both of my browsers IE7 and FF (sign).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
