<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do we have to worry about the Friendster patents?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/do-we-have-to-worry-about-the-friendster-patents/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/do-we-have-to-worry-about-the-friendster-patents</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/do-we-have-to-worry-about-the-friendster-patents#comment-239537</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/do-we-have-to-worry-about-the-friendster-patents#comment-239537</guid>
		<description>Huminity.com did a visual friends presentation before friendster did. Theyrule.com as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huminity.com did a visual friends presentation before friendster did. Theyrule.com as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobby</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/do-we-have-to-worry-about-the-friendster-patents#comment-239461</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/do-we-have-to-worry-about-the-friendster-patents#comment-239461</guid>
		<description>marc,

right on target

b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marc,</p>
<p>right on target</p>
<p>b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/do-we-have-to-worry-about-the-friendster-patents#comment-239456</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/do-we-have-to-worry-about-the-friendster-patents#comment-239456</guid>
		<description>Marc

Well put, deffo a help for those looking to start out in this game</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc</p>
<p>Well put, deffo a help for those looking to start out in this game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendster's Patents &#171; Lee Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/do-we-have-to-worry-about-the-friendster-patents#comment-239455</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendster's Patents &#171; Lee Wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/03/do-we-have-to-worry-about-the-friendster-patents#comment-239455</guid>
		<description>[...] 21st, 2007 by Lee Wilkins    Marc Canter has an interesting post on &#8220;do we have to worry about the Friendster patents?&#8220; From what my novice (25+ years in the business) eyes - the three Friendster’s patents are: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 21st, 2007 by Lee Wilkins    Marc Canter has an interesting post on &#8220;do we have to worry about the Friendster patents?&#8220; From what my novice (25+ years in the business) eyes - the three Friendster’s patents are: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
