<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OM is right - social networking is embedding itself into everything</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/02/omis-right-social-networking-is-embedding-itself-into-everything/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/02/omis-right-social-networking-is-embedding-itself-into-everything</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; A Taxonomy of Social Networks?</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/02/omis-right-social-networking-is-embedding-itself-into-everything#comment-238730</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; A Taxonomy of Social Networks?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 02:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/02/omis-right-social-networking-is-embedding-itself-into-everything#comment-238730</guid>
		<description>[...] or community these days, but most of the stuff I&#8217;ve tried using is pretty crappy. Marc Canter blogged about Om missing his contributor in the space, People Aggregator, as well as his competitors IBM, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or community these days, but most of the stuff I&#8217;ve tried using is pretty crappy. Marc Canter blogged about Om missing his contributor in the space, People Aggregator, as well as his competitors IBM, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanp</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/02/omis-right-social-networking-is-embedding-itself-into-everything#comment-238653</link>
		<dc:creator>alanp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 12:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/02/omis-right-social-networking-is-embedding-itself-into-everything#comment-238653</guid>
		<description>No, dont have autoswitch - you want to surf the chat channels as well as the TV channels :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, dont have autoswitch - you want to surf the chat channels as well as the TV channels <img src='http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Bond</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/02/omis-right-social-networking-is-embedding-itself-into-everything#comment-238651</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/02/omis-right-social-networking-is-embedding-itself-into-everything#comment-238651</guid>
		<description>See Joost.

Just had yet another stupid web2.0 idea. Related to chat. A group of real time chat channels with one channel per TV channel to provide a back channel for people to talk about what's showing on TV right now. You'd want to have this setup so that as you changed TV channel the chat channel changed as well. It's ripping the social bits of Joost out of Joost and into a web site that served all the existing TV. Anyone seen anything like that? If you built it, what chat technology would you use? Skype's 100 participant limit would be too small</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Joost.</p>
<p>Just had yet another stupid web2.0 idea. Related to chat. A group of real time chat channels with one channel per TV channel to provide a back channel for people to talk about what&#8217;s showing on TV right now. You&#8217;d want to have this setup so that as you changed TV channel the chat channel changed as well. It&#8217;s ripping the social bits of Joost out of Joost and into a web site that served all the existing TV. Anyone seen anything like that? If you built it, what chat technology would you use? Skype&#8217;s 100 participant limit would be too small</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
