<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPTV and podcasting is not TV or Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/01/iptv-and-podcasting-is-not-tv-or-radio/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/01/iptv-and-podcasting-is-not-tv-or-radio</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Notebooks In the Daytime, TVs at Night, For Now &#124; Entrepreneurship with John Furrier: Podcasts with Entrepreneurs and VCs</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/01/iptv-and-podcasting-is-not-tv-or-radio#comment-237650</link>
		<dc:creator>Notebooks In the Daytime, TVs at Night, For Now &#124; Entrepreneurship with John Furrier: Podcasts with Entrepreneurs and VCs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/01/iptv-and-podcasting-is-not-tv-or-radio#comment-237650</guid>
		<description>[...] It's become old hat to  suggest that the world of media is changing faster than the old media companies, and that the computer and tech world &#8212; long accustomed to turning sharp corners quickly &#8212; has the advantage of momentum in the new, post-YouTube climate. However, the opportunities for software developers around the globe is enormous, says Intel's Sean Maloney. And what about for Intel? I mentioned to Maloney that I think of the PC as the new TV, at least during the day. If that holds true, the prospects for companies like his &#8212; and others &#8212; are also pretty good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s become old hat to  suggest that the world of media is changing faster than the old media companies, and that the computer and tech world &#8212; long accustomed to turning sharp corners quickly &#8212; has the advantage of momentum in the new, post-YouTube climate. However, the opportunities for software developers around the globe is enormous, says Intel&#8217;s Sean Maloney. And what about for Intel? I mentioned to Maloney that I think of the PC as the new TV, at least during the day. If that holds true, the prospects for companies like his &#8212; and others &#8212; are also pretty good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notebooks In the Daytime, TVs at Night, For Now &#124; PodTech.net: Technology, Business, Media, and News Podcasts</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/01/iptv-and-podcasting-is-not-tv-or-radio#comment-237649</link>
		<dc:creator>Notebooks In the Daytime, TVs at Night, For Now &#124; PodTech.net: Technology, Business, Media, and News Podcasts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/01/iptv-and-podcasting-is-not-tv-or-radio#comment-237649</guid>
		<description>[...] It's become old hat to  suggest that the world of media is changing faster than the old media companies, and that the computer and tech world &#8212; long accustomed to turning sharp corners quickly &#8212; has the advantage of momentum in the new, post-YouTube climate. However, the opportunities for software developers around the globe is enormous, says Intel's Sean Maloney. And what about for Intel? I mentioned to Maloney that I think of the PC as the new TV, at least during the day. If that holds true, the prospects for companies like his &#8212; and others &#8212; are also pretty good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s become old hat to  suggest that the world of media is changing faster than the old media companies, and that the computer and tech world &#8212; long accustomed to turning sharp corners quickly &#8212; has the advantage of momentum in the new, post-YouTube climate. However, the opportunities for software developers around the globe is enormous, says Intel&#8217;s Sean Maloney. And what about for Intel? I mentioned to Maloney that I think of the PC as the new TV, at least during the day. If that holds true, the prospects for companies like his &#8212; and others &#8212; are also pretty good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P-Air</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/01/iptv-and-podcasting-is-not-tv-or-radio#comment-237646</link>
		<dc:creator>P-Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2007/01/iptv-and-podcasting-is-not-tv-or-radio#comment-237646</guid>
		<description>Perhaps another view of the displacement issue should be more focused around the displacement of the attention we give to each of these mediums.  Back when there was radio but no TV, radio got the lion's share of our attention...then TV came along and some of our time went to that.  Now it's the Internet.  Throughout all of this, the one thing that hasn't changed (at least Bush hasn't mandated it yet ;) is that days are still 24 hrs long.  So w/all of these new mediums emerging, it's the amount of time that they used to command from each of us that has taken the hit, even if the medium's beat goes on.  As a result, I'm sure their economics are also impacted, so perhaps that makes some of them less viable or in need of new economics to adapt to their lowered attention-getting percentage (or something like that ;).  Hence, in reading any article on the "death of {name your in trouble medium du jour}", I'd interpret this along the lines of the drop in % of attention it's receiving fm us and the impact on their economics.  Try that on for size and see if it works for ya :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps another view of the displacement issue should be more focused around the displacement of the attention we give to each of these mediums.  Back when there was radio but no TV, radio got the lion&#8217;s share of our attention&#8230;then TV came along and some of our time went to that.  Now it&#8217;s the Internet.  Throughout all of this, the one thing that hasn&#8217;t changed (at least Bush hasn&#8217;t mandated it yet <img src='http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> is that days are still 24 hrs long.  So w/all of these new mediums emerging, it&#8217;s the amount of time that they used to command from each of us that has taken the hit, even if the medium&#8217;s beat goes on.  As a result, I&#8217;m sure their economics are also impacted, so perhaps that makes some of them less viable or in need of new economics to adapt to their lowered attention-getting percentage (or something like that ;).  Hence, in reading any article on the &#8220;death of {name your in trouble medium du jour}&#8221;, I&#8217;d interpret this along the lines of the drop in % of attention it&#8217;s receiving fm us and the impact on their economics.  Try that on for size and see if it works for ya <img src='http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
