Wow! Facebook gets dissed by its users for providing coolio new functionality
Ever wake up in a twlight zone, where everything that you think is true - is trounced on by limited thinking users demanding their status quo - back? It must have been the full moon.
By now everyone must have heard that many Facebook users did not the new News Feed feature - which shows what their friends have been up to - recently. I think the solution would have been to have this feature set default to OFF - and set up everyone’s accounts so that they show NOTHING to ANYBODY.
Then as folks would discover this feature, they’d turn it on and have fun with it. The Mini feed literally just puts functionality they had already - in one place. But yet - folks are freaking out.
Speculation is flying as to “what will or won’t prevail in this debacle?”
Further observations shows that the problems of a large network - with 1,000,000s of people on it - simply would not exist if you had as small intimate network to work with. Folks would feel more comfortable providing feeback, instead of havigng to create huge uproars, new features could get gradually leaked and feedback collected long before they go live and in general - any single change would only effect a MUCH SMALLER number of people, thereby lessening he overall effect of the change.
We used to run into this problem at Tribe all the time. We’d turn on new features - and folks would holler and scream. Then we figured out that if we sneaked it to key people and previewed the new stuff - they’d actually welcome the changes.
Remember these are people who are there - by choice - not because they HAVE to be there.
Big places change bigly. Stumbling, throwing huge switches that effect millions in fail swoop. Certain clients of ours have that problem - or shall I say challenge. But I’m confidant they’ll learn from this debacle.
While small intimate places listen and talk directly to their user - with a sincere ear - and in fact they themselves are the users - too - so everyone partricipates in the changes.
That’s what really going on at Facebook - backlash from a place that is just too dam BIG.
If folks would try out these new featurews (from a fun POV) and turn off ANYTHING that they might be sensitive about - I think everything will be fine. Turn off the feature by default and let peopple Opt In.
This is all such a shame, because as Pete points out - Facebook has been doing some incredible, ground breaking suff - that we’re all going to benefit from. I wonder how this will effect their TOS and attitude towards exporting this user data. I sure know how I’ll argue:
“Dudes - you gotta make up for this debacle by showing your users that you KNOW that THEY control their user data - not you. Stop calling it ‘Facebook data’. Its your CUSTOMER’s data, not yours! Let that data be FREE!”
I also wonder if Facebook users know how lucky they are to have such coolio features as a dynamically displayed page, which shows different stuff to deifferent people - based upon who they are. We had that in the original PeepAgg and we plan to bring it back.
And this whole “what are my friends up to” feature - completely rocks. Now we just have to find the courage to turn it on.

September 6th, 2006 at 9:55 am
I was a long time user (since inception …oh so long ago) of Facebook and found that everyone dropped off after college. I think these new tools would have kept me more interested, but as i continue on my digital journey i find myspace and especially new things like http://www.uplayme.com starting to fill the void. good luck FB but i wont likely return.
September 6th, 2006 at 10:02 am
For non-facebook users who want to find discussion of this new feature (and can’t look at the discussion in the facebook groups) there is a lot of activity at the Facebook discussion room http://www.talkface.com
September 6th, 2006 at 1:42 pm
Here is a live counter of the number of people who have joined the “Students against Facebook News Feed” group on Facebook….. 300,000 and climbing
http://digg.com/tech_news/Facebook_Stalker_City_Includes_LIVE_Counter
September 6th, 2006 at 6:08 pm
[...] Of course, the blogosphere has picked up the story as well. One blog even has a live counter (now over 430,000) of the number of users in the group. [...]
September 6th, 2006 at 6:18 pm
[...] Mark Canter takes Facebook’s side (but explains that Facebook should cry Uncle and listen to its users) in a post titled “Facebook gets dissed by its users for providing coolio new features.” [...]
September 7th, 2006 at 4:49 am
I’m flabbergasted by the scale of the backlash. Many of my own friends have joined the super-group.
Personally, I like the changes. However, my friends list is small - it really is only my friends, and so to me everything in the feed is interesting. The people who have huge friend lists have suddenly realised that they’re broadcasting to the masses.
I can’t believe none of this picked up in testing though. They did test it, didn’t they??
September 7th, 2006 at 9:17 pm
[...] Mark Canter takes Facebook’s side (but explains that Facebook should cry Uncle and listen to its users) in a post titled “Facebook gets dissed by its users for providing coolio new features.” [...]
September 8th, 2006 at 5:14 am
[...] Mark Canter takes Facebook’s side (but explains that Facebook should cry Uncle and listen to its users) in a post titled “Facebook gets dissed by its users for providing coolio new features.” [...]
December 10th, 2006 at 3:46 pm
d41d8cd98f00b20