<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rafat disagrees with me on the mixture of media and content in a single company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/03/rafat-disagrees-with-me-on-the-mixture-of-media-and-content-in-a-single-company/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/03/rafat-disagrees-with-me-on-the-mixture-of-media-and-content-in-a-single-company</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vannes</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/03/rafat-disagrees-with-me-on-the-mixture-of-media-and-content-in-a-single-company#comment-47408</link>
		<dc:creator>vannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/03/rafat-disagrees-with-me-on-the-mixture-of-media-and-content-in-a-single-company#comment-47408</guid>
		<description>I'm love this great website. Many thanks guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m love this great website. Many thanks guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/03/rafat-disagrees-with-me-on-the-mixture-of-media-and-content-in-a-single-company#comment-46988</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/03/rafat-disagrees-with-me-on-the-mixture-of-media-and-content-in-a-single-company#comment-46988</guid>
		<description>It makes perfect sense.
CNET is about destination websites.

With Chowhound / Chow.com you are looking at users that will have a very high repeat history at coming back to the website. Also , whats funny is that why would you think that CNET is not about content ? 

Most of the Gamespot &#38; Redball products are all about content.

What is different with this site is that a lot of the content is from the community, this is more in line with the reviews you see on yahoo , yelp , about , etc 

All in all its a smart move to continue to diversify out of Tech &#38; Games that tend to have their heaviest activities in Q4 and around major convention dates like E3.

Destination sites that are used year round just make sense for Web Companies that may feel their too focused in one key group of Industries.

For the following think about what new unique group will be available and when they are most apt to look for content.

TV.com 
Metacritic
Chow.com &#38; Chowhound.com
Webshots.com
Consumating.com

plus the new sites to come 

The key is to think about the content and the Advertisers that might be attracted by it plus the fact that you can also leverage content deals with other companies like Google for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes perfect sense.<br />
CNET is about destination websites.</p>
<p>With Chowhound / Chow.com you are looking at users that will have a very high repeat history at coming back to the website. Also , whats funny is that why would you think that CNET is not about content ? </p>
<p>Most of the Gamespot &amp; Redball products are all about content.</p>
<p>What is different with this site is that a lot of the content is from the community, this is more in line with the reviews you see on yahoo , yelp , about , etc </p>
<p>All in all its a smart move to continue to diversify out of Tech &amp; Games that tend to have their heaviest activities in Q4 and around major convention dates like E3.</p>
<p>Destination sites that are used year round just make sense for Web Companies that may feel their too focused in one key group of Industries.</p>
<p>For the following think about what new unique group will be available and when they are most apt to look for content.</p>
<p>TV.com<br />
Metacritic<br />
Chow.com &amp; Chowhound.com<br />
Webshots.com<br />
Consumating.com</p>
<p>plus the new sites to come </p>
<p>The key is to think about the content and the Advertisers that might be attracted by it plus the fact that you can also leverage content deals with other companies like Google for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Next round of interesting links - early April &#8216;06</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/03/rafat-disagrees-with-me-on-the-mixture-of-media-and-content-in-a-single-company#comment-33844</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Next round of interesting links - early April &#8216;06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/03/rafat-disagrees-with-me-on-the-mixture-of-media-and-content-in-a-single-company#comment-33844</guid>
		<description>[...] CNet goes vertical - goes after college students.  So now they&#8217;re a technology company. Before we talked about them being either a media company or news agency.  I guess they get to be all three. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CNet goes vertical - goes after college students.  So now they&#8217;re a technology company. Before we talked about them being either a media company or news agency.  I guess they get to be all three. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
