Comments on: Attaching meta-data or not http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/01/attaching-meta-data-or-not Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure Sat, 10 May 2008 01:50:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 By: card games online free holdem poker online http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/01/attaching-meta-data-or-not#comment-64594 card games online free holdem poker online Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:05:28 +0000 http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/01/attaching-meta-data-or-not#comment-64594 <strong>card games online free holdem poker online</strong> characteristically denotable collaborate sloped blurting duplication free holdem poker online tournament http://www.theholdempokeronline.com/free-holdem-poker-online.html card games online free holdem poker online

characteristically denotable collaborate sloped blurting duplication free holdem poker online tournament http://www.theholdempokeronline.com/free-holdem-poker-online.html

]]> By: Danny http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/01/attaching-meta-data-or-not#comment-28212 Danny Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:58:42 +0000 http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/01/attaching-meta-data-or-not#comment-28212 What Phil said. Remember it's not either-or, you can use text processing tools to extract information alongside tagging etc. Explicit metadata (like the date of RSS items) can boost the collective value of all the metadata available, including the text-mined stuf. Although manually entered material is the most expensive for the user (e.g. the creator of an RSS feed) it's potentially the most valuable, and if the systems are built well the return from it can be maximised. Once you have that information, as Phil hints there are plenty of choices on what you do with it. Yup, I'd use the RDF/OWL stack, it's designed for processing resource descriptions on the web. What Phil said.

Remember it’s not either-or, you can use text processing tools to extract information alongside tagging etc. Explicit metadata (like the date of RSS items) can boost the collective value of all the metadata available, including the text-mined stuf. Although manually entered material is the most expensive for the user (e.g. the creator of an RSS feed) it’s potentially the most valuable, and if the systems are built well the return from it can be maximised.

Once you have that information, as Phil hints there are plenty of choices on what you do with it. Yup, I’d use the RDF/OWL stack, it’s designed for processing resource descriptions on the web.

]]> By: Phillip Pearson http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/01/attaching-meta-data-or-not#comment-27898 Phillip Pearson Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:11:41 +0000 http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2006/01/attaching-meta-data-or-not#comment-27898 I think Dave is saying "forget about the metadata, just look at what you WRITE about". Simply looking for keywords in blog posts would get you a long way towards finding what people are interested about. Links and tags would be next. Then, if you're Danny, you dump all this out as RDF and feed it into a chain of tools written by RDF hackers... while Dave would push it out as OPML and evangelise the hell out of it until someone builds it :-) I think Dave is saying “forget about the metadata, just look at what you WRITE about”.

Simply looking for keywords in blog posts would get you a long way towards finding what people are interested about. Links and tags would be next.

Then, if you’re Danny, you dump all this out as RDF and feed it into a chain of tools written by RDF hackers… while Dave would push it out as OPML and evangelise the hell out of it until someone builds it :-)

]]>