<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canter&#8217;s Law #1</title>
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-73649</link>
		<author>James</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-73649</guid>
		<description>I saw that you have a page that discusses patent-related resources at http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1.  I wanted to suggest adding www.freepatentsonline.com to the page.  This web site has free PDF downloading (instead of having to page through TIFFs like at the US PTO). It is by far the best free patent searching site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that you have a page that discusses patent-related resources at <a href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1." rel="nofollow">http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1.</a>  I wanted to suggest adding <a href="http://www.freepatentsonline.com" rel="nofollow">www.freepatentsonline.com</a> to the page.  This web site has free PDF downloading (instead of having to page through TIFFs like at the US PTO). It is by far the best free patent searching site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can you smell that? I can smell it from here!</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-34584</link>
		<author>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can you smell that? I can smell it from here!</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-34584</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ll cosy up to and support NetVibes, Pageflakes, Omnidrives, Box.net - all sorts of media repositories and the new era of aggregators - like Plum and dabble.  We&#8217;ll also strive to support all the myriad of module/widget formats - like the ones coming out from AOL, Yahoo, Google, Microsoft and SixApart.  We want to be everyone&#8217;s friend.  You HAVE to - to be a true DLA and adhere to Canter&#8217;s Law #1. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] We&#8217;ll cosy up to and support NetVibes, Pageflakes, Omnidrives, Box.net - all sorts of media repositories and the new era of aggregators - like Plum and dabble.  We&#8217;ll also strive to support all the myriad of module/widget formats - like the ones coming out from AOL, Yahoo, Google, Microsoft and SixApart.  We want to be everyone&#8217;s friend.  You HAVE to - to be a true DLA and adhere to Canter&#8217;s Law #1. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hellonline (Eran&#8217;s blog) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microcontent Design and Good Engineering</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-33357</link>
		<author>Hellonline (Eran&#8217;s blog) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microcontent Design and Good Engineering</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-33357</guid>
		<description>[...] Richard MacManus is writing an interesting series of posts about microcontent design (more here). I agree with most of Richard&#8217;s ideas and with some of the problems he forsees for microcontent. There is, however, one important point take I’d like to take issue with. Richard metions Canter’s Law #1: it basically says: support all formats and don&#8217;t take sides, because the user doesn&#8217;t care about your geeky format wars. As Marc put it : &#8220;No human cares about what format is supported. Only us. Flickr proved that they could be completely format agnostic and provide a compelling experience to all.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Richard MacManus is writing an interesting series of posts about microcontent design (more here). I agree with most of Richard&#8217;s ideas and with some of the problems he forsees for microcontent. There is, however, one important point take I’d like to take issue with. Richard metions Canter’s Law #1: it basically says: support all formats and don&#8217;t take sides, because the user doesn&#8217;t care about your geeky format wars. As Marc put it : &#8220;No human cares about what format is supported. Only us. Flickr proved that they could be completely format agnostic and provide a compelling experience to all.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lots of StructuredBlogging discussions</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-19132</link>
		<author>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lots of StructuredBlogging discussions</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-19132</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember: - we&#8217;re 100% microformats compatible - despite what some folks have insinuated - we&#8217;re more than just page tags, we&#8217;re also about subscription formats, file formats and working together - anyone who says &#8220;my format is better than your format&#8221; - is not us. We are everyone. We are not just ONE format. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Remember: - we&#8217;re 100% microformats compatible - despite what some folks have insinuated - we&#8217;re more than just page tags, we&#8217;re also about subscription formats, file formats and working together - anyone who says &#8220;my format is better than your format&#8221; - is not us. We are everyone. We are not just ONE format. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mainstreaming RSS subscription user interfaces</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-2960</link>
		<author>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mainstreaming RSS subscription user interfaces</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-2960</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s Canter&#8217;s Law #1. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] That&#8217;s Canter&#8217;s Law #1. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Structured Blogging is coming</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-2959</link>
		<author>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Structured Blogging is coming</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/09/canters_law_1#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>[...] Also we promise that this will support every kind of format there is, in every syndication f ormat, page tag and file format youc na think of. We prescribe to Canter&#8217;s Law #1. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Also we promise that this will support every kind of format there is, in every syndication f ormat, page tag and file format youc na think of. We prescribe to Canter&#8217;s Law #1. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
