<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Identity Hub</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/07/the_identity_hu/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/07/the_identity_hu</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oldnslic</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/07/the_identity_hu#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldnslic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc_blogs_it.myelin.co.nz/?p=2321#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>I am truly in awe of the potential uses such system. It also scares me a little—as the whole internet thing does.  What’s scary to me is the “forms of life” that’s being created.  I recently read David Brin’s “The Transparent Society” within which he describes two opposing traits that appear in disputes over privacy.

A.	One group believes that another group is inherently dangerous, and that its potential to do harm is exacerbated by secrecy.  Therefore, accountability must be forced upon that group through enhanced flow of information.
B.	The other argues that some vital good will be threatened by heightened candor, and hence wants the proposed data flow shut down.

As I am in midst of designing a portal to bring people together to play with philosophical and ethical ideas—which argument do you think your application/system will have the greatest impact on?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am truly in awe of the potential uses such system. It also scares me a little—as the whole internet thing does.  What’s scary to me is the “forms of life” that’s being created.  I recently read David Brin’s “The Transparent Society” within which he describes two opposing traits that appear in disputes over privacy.</p>
<p>A.	One group believes that another group is inherently dangerous, and that its potential to do harm is exacerbated by secrecy.  Therefore, accountability must be forced upon that group through enhanced flow of information.<br />
B.	The other argues that some vital good will be threatened by heightened candor, and hence wants the proposed data flow shut down.</p>
<p>As I am in midst of designing a portal to bring people together to play with philosophical and ethical ideas—which argument do you think your application/system will have the greatest impact on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ofieldstream</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2005/07/the_identity_hu#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>ofieldstream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc_blogs_it.myelin.co.nz/?p=2321#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>Marc - I've read of you through Dave Winer's blogs and a few others - but I guess I didn' realize you were working on this type of project.  It all sounds interesting. When will we be able to 'taste it'?

Look forward to seeing, reading and trying this new system out.

ofieldstream</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc - I&#8217;ve read of you through Dave Winer&#8217;s blogs and a few others - but I guess I didn&#8217; realize you were working on this type of project.  It all sounds interesting. When will we be able to &#8216;taste it&#8217;?</p>
<p>Look forward to seeing, reading and trying this new system out.</p>
<p>ofieldstream</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
