<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But wait!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2004/10/but_wait/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2004/10/but_wait</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: leigh</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2004/10/but_wait#comment-43421</link>
		<dc:creator>leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc_blogs_it.myelin.co.nz/?p=1760#comment-43421</guid>
		<description>thank you for your work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for your work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Weinberger</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2004/10/but_wait#comment-1997</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weinberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc_blogs_it.myelin.co.nz/?p=1760#comment-1997</guid>
		<description>Marc, first, thanks for fixing the quote problem. I appreciate it.

I continue to believe 100% that you will not stop people from saying what they want. I've never questioned that. In the post you quote, I say I'm worried about bloggers wondering if they'll get their contracts RENEWED. So, let's say I sign up for 3 months and I lambast your client. If I know you can opt to renew my contract for another 3 months, I may find myself softening what I say. I'd be more comfortable with your proposal if there were no possibility of renewal. But, even then, I may want to please you (= the broker) so you'll throw some business to me with your next client.

I also don't understand why you don't insist that bloggers mark their paid content as paid content. What possible reason could a blogger have for not doing so except to please the client? If you believe in transparency (and I know you do), you should insist on it. In fact, I still think it'd be better to box beholden posts in a separate part of the page. That way, the blogger doesn't break trust with her readers, and your client doesn't run the risk of a getting a black eye when the blogger is exposed.

Overall, I look at this idea and, even though it'd put money in bloggers' pockets, it seems to me to make the blogosphere a worse place, not a better one. And, unfortunately, it undermines what I take to be the core value of blogging: The trust that people are speaking from their hearts.

So, overall, I hope you don't do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, first, thanks for fixing the quote problem. I appreciate it.</p>
<p>I continue to believe 100% that you will not stop people from saying what they want. I&#8217;ve never questioned that. In the post you quote, I say I&#8217;m worried about bloggers wondering if they&#8217;ll get their contracts RENEWED. So, let&#8217;s say I sign up for 3 months and I lambast your client. If I know you can opt to renew my contract for another 3 months, I may find myself softening what I say. I&#8217;d be more comfortable with your proposal if there were no possibility of renewal. But, even then, I may want to please you (= the broker) so you&#8217;ll throw some business to me with your next client.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t understand why you don&#8217;t insist that bloggers mark their paid content as paid content. What possible reason could a blogger have for not doing so except to please the client? If you believe in transparency (and I know you do), you should insist on it. In fact, I still think it&#8217;d be better to box beholden posts in a separate part of the page. That way, the blogger doesn&#8217;t break trust with her readers, and your client doesn&#8217;t run the risk of a getting a black eye when the blogger is exposed.</p>
<p>Overall, I look at this idea and, even though it&#8217;d put money in bloggers&#8217; pockets, it seems to me to make the blogosphere a worse place, not a better one. And, unfortunately, it undermines what I take to be the core value of blogging: The trust that people are speaking from their hearts.</p>
<p>So, overall, I hope you don&#8217;t do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
