<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video Communicating</title>
	<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2004/08/video_communica</link>
	<description>Digital Lifestyle Aggregation - helping to establish open source infrastructure</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: jay dedman</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2004/08/video_communica#comment-1573</link>
		<author>jay dedman</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2004/08/video_communica#comment-1573</guid>
		<description>I agree that video is bigger than videoblogging...and hopefully one day soon, we SHOW each other what's going on and how its happening.
yes yes yes

but in the menatiome, video blogging is a great format.
its short.
its updated daily.
and it is supported by the current technology.

what you are discussing needs:
1. unlimited storage and bandwidth (open-media?)
2. filesharing of DVD quality video
(bit torrent?)
3. making playlists
(webjay that can handle QT?)
4. getting the video onto the TV
(freevo?)

This will allow for us to make vidoes and share them with each other across the world to watch collectively on our TV's at home.
but this is just the sharing/presentation vision.

much work needs to be done on the production tools.
like an all-in-one tool that edits, compresses and posts video.
right now, it takes too many applications to get video on the web.
also, we need to figure out codec issues.
wmv vs QY vs real

i really like the Open-Media.org idea.
its a big step.
Im working on getting the community of people to actually start speaking in the language of video.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that video is bigger than videoblogging&#8230;and hopefully one day soon, we SHOW each other what&#8217;s going on and how its happening.<br />
yes yes yes</p>
<p>but in the menatiome, video blogging is a great format.<br />
its short.<br />
its updated daily.<br />
and it is supported by the current technology.</p>
<p>what you are discussing needs:<br />
1. unlimited storage and bandwidth (open-media?)<br />
2. filesharing of DVD quality video<br />
(bit torrent?)<br />
3. making playlists<br />
(webjay that can handle QT?)<br />
4. getting the video onto the TV<br />
(freevo?)</p>
<p>This will allow for us to make vidoes and share them with each other across the world to watch collectively on our TV&#8217;s at home.<br />
but this is just the sharing/presentation vision.</p>
<p>much work needs to be done on the production tools.<br />
like an all-in-one tool that edits, compresses and posts video.<br />
right now, it takes too many applications to get video on the web.<br />
also, we need to figure out codec issues.<br />
wmv vs QY vs real</p>
<p>i really like the Open-Media.org idea.<br />
its a big step.<br />
Im working on getting the community of people to actually start speaking in the language of video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Niederhofer</title>
		<link>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2004/08/video_communica#comment-1572</link>
		<author>Max Niederhofer</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2004/08/video_communica#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>I'm not so sure about those first thoughts. I find myself having difficulty understanding complex relationships when they are talked about. They sound easy enough. But sometimes I just need to see it worked through, ie I need it in front of me. And that real-time pause-think-continue setting just brings up so many usability issues that, ahem, paper often seems the better option.
-- Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about those first thoughts. I find myself having difficulty understanding complex relationships when they are talked about. They sound easy enough. But sometimes I just need to see it worked through, ie I need it in front of me. And that real-time pause-think-continue setting just brings up so many usability issues that, ahem, paper often seems the better option.<br />
&#8211; Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
